|
|
Message from Italy to Austria
Philippe,
Well...I owe you an apology.
You have nothing to fear from me in the short to medium term.
I have much bigger problems.
Message from Austria to Turkey
Hi Jason,
So, what should I expect from you now?
Philippe
Message from Russia to Austria
Philippe,
Sorry not to have warned you about the two army builds. Part of the reason
was that I was undecided on the second build until late, late in the turn.
I went on faith that you still prefer the tactic that we get Jason trusting
me, and that you can use that to press Andy. With the Italian build in Mar, I
think your position is looking much stronger. And while I did build in War,
that is not aimed at you.
So far I've only heard a brief note from Andy expressing his disappointment
with Jason's build. He could approach you for an AI vs. RT deal, or he could
approach me for an RI vs. AT deal. Actually, he's good enough that he'll
probably do both. But he's going to have difficulty pulling back from you. If
you think he's going to continue to attack you, then I'm willing to send a
unit to help you defend (something like Gal-Boh-Tyl). I understand that
Austria at 4 in 1903 looks bleak statistically, but I still see AR as a good
match for us, and I think you are in better shape now than at any point since
S1901.
I'm likely to be unavailable the rest of the day (Jury Duty), but let's keep
talking.
--- Eric
Message from Austria to Germany and Italy
Tony & Andy,
Following the recent constructions and Andy's overture,
it would seem that renewing the AIG alliance is the thing
to do. If we don't, the eF & Rt alliances will make short
work of us.
Of course, Russia is saying that War isn't aimed at me;
but even if it were true, it will only mean that he intend
to surround me by moving against Germany.
Hopefully, Andy really mean what he say this time, and
will demilitarize Venice; but if he doesn't, I intend to
favor Russia's expansion while hurting Andy as much as
possible.
This being clear, how do we proceed?
Philippe
Message from Germany to Austria and Italy
Well I have my own problems up north and am more than willing to share them.
I have received the same information from Russia regarding WAR. So I wonder
who it is intended for.
I am more than willing to see ven in pie, tun in wes and vie in boh.
Unrealistic but pleasing to the mind.
If either of you has a magic wand then please do wave wave wave.
For the spring I have my hands full in GErmany. I may be facing EFR all at
once.
I have considered pru and sil but by going there I would only be giving
france all my sc's. Even if AG managed to take WAR then I for one probably
wont be able to build.
But if either of you have any ideas then I am all ears. Not for long as my
head will sonn be rolling.
Message from Austria to Germany and Italy
What about the following?
Germany: Hol-Ruh, Kie s Hol-Ruh, Ber-Pru, Mun-Boh & Den-Bal or hold.
Italy: Ven-Pie, Tun-Wes, Ion-Tys, Gre-Bul & Rom-Tus for convoy to Spa.
Austria: Vie-Boh, Ser s Gre-Bul, Bud-Rum & Adr-Ion.
Major points being:
-Russia can't get more then one army near Germany.
-Any repositionning of RT fleets in the south see Turkey lose Bul.
-France lose the initiative to Italy in the south.
This leave me wide open to a stab by Andy, but I don't have
much choice and will have to rely on Andy's survival instinct.
Philippe
Message from Germany to Austria and Italy
It would be interesting to know what has brought you two together? Is it the
juggernaut, the French build or both?
It would also be good to hear from Italy.
I dont mind playing dead this year and losing MUN, DEN and maybe HOL. That
is what will probably happen.
I am expecting nth - hel, lon - nth, ska - den supported by swe.
If I am going to die then I would like more insight to know for sure that I
am dying for a worthy cause.
Message from Austria to Germany and Italy
> It would be interesting to know what has brought you two together? Is it the
> juggernaut, the French build or both?
> It would also be good to hear from Italy.
> I dont mind playing dead this year and losing MUN, DEN and maybe HOL. That
> is what will probably happen.
> I am expecting nth - hel, lon - nth, ska - den supported by swe.
> If I am going to die then I would like more insight to know for sure that I
> am dying for a worthy cause.
In truth, Andy only told me I didn't have to fear him
anymore since he had bigger problems. Since it seem
to really be the case, I opted to believe him.
Now, I would hope to hear more from him...
Philippe
Message from Italy to Austria and Germany
Gentlemen,
apologies for my silence. Its been a tough couple of weeks around here.
> In truth, Andy only told me I didn't have to fear him
> anymore since he had bigger problems. Since it seem
> to really be the case, I opted to believe him.
>
> Now, I would hope to hear more from him...
What do you guys want to do, since we do have a RT coming at us...
You mentioned a full move on the French...which is possible.
Im buried at work and trying to coordinate going to 2 funerals in 2
different cities.
Message from Austria to Germany and Italy
> Im buried at work and trying to coordinate going to 2 funerals in 2
> different cities.
Sorry about that.
I already outline a plan. So, when you have the time to
examine it in details, let me know what you think of it.
Philippe
Message from Austria to France
Hi Erik,
Well, with all the trouble I'm in, I'm glad to see
you build a fleet in Mar.
Do you have any good news for me?
Philippe
Message from Austria to England
Hi Ben,
Unless I'm mistaken, an RT it is. It may help
on the italian front, but I will have to wait to
know for sure.
Have you heard anything on your side?
Philippe
Message from Austria to Russia
Eric,
I thought we had changed tactic and that the goal of getting
you in Rum was to see you build a fleet. Instead, you opt
to build two armies. You may say they aren't aimed at me,
but if your goal was to expand in the north, why not build a
fleet in Stp?
Hopefully, this will make thing easier with Andy, but one
thing is sure, I don't want you in Boh. In fact, I will be
keeping watch on what you do with all those armies.
Yours truly,
Philippe
Message from Italy to Austria and Germany
> > Im buried at work and trying to coordinate going to 2 funerals in 2
> > different cities.
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> I already outline a plan. So, when you have the time to
> examine it in details, let me know what you think of it.
I glanced at it, and it looked decent, let me get a good look at it
tonight and I will get back to you then.
Andy
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
> Unless I'm mistaken, an RT it is. It may help
> on the italian front, but I will have to wait to
> know for sure.
>
> Have you heard anything on your side?
Reading between the lines of some press I got from Turkey, and on the
builds, I am pretty sure of the RT. I am hoping you can now bury the
hatchet with Andy and work with him - he is well situated to push East, if
he likes. I do not think he has anything to fear from Erik - yet - F MAR
notwithstanding.
Everything I hear from Eric is sugar and spice. So it is difficult to
distill meaning or truth in correspondence from him. But that is my guess.
Ben
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
I've taken the liberty of encouraging Andy to work with you. Perhaps he is
already, but AI is important in the face of RT. As you know.
Ben
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
One thing you can try is, if you can successfully bury the hatchet with
Andy, a late Lepanto. It's like you & he are already set up for it: his
fleets push east & his army VEN goes TYR - BOH to help with GAL and
ultimately to WAR, etc. It's the original Lepanto, and the best way to
bring his units to bear against RT, as far as I know.
It would require some trust on both your parts, but it is the natural &
old-fashioned antidote to the Juggernaut.
Do you want me to bounce it off him, or something? Let me know your
thoughts.
Ben
Message from Austria to England
> Do you want me to bounce it off him, or something? Let me know your
> thoughts.
Thanks Ben,
I appreciate it, but would prefer you wait abit to see how he
react to your initial approach first. I wouldn't want to rush
him.
Also, does your word carry any weight with Jason? It would
be interesting to have him start thinking to break off the RT,
so it's easier to convince him to do so later on.
Regards,
Philippe
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
> I appreciate it, but would prefer you wait abit to see how he
> react to your initial approach first. I wouldn't want to rush
> him.
I do not understand this. My initial approach to him was that he should
try to work with you, because an AI is necessary to fight an RT. Without
it, A goes down first, and I, G and E soon after. The only power that may
benefit is France, and clearly the power that goes down the hardest is
Austria - you. You say you want to wait and see, my friend, if you do,
then you and shortly after, I will pay the price. *My* survival depends on
your ability to fight off an RT, which you cannot do without Italian
assistance both against Turkey - TUN - EAS, etc., and against Russia - VEN
- TYR - BOH. I do not write these words lightly - I am deadly serious. If
you and Andy cannot hold hands for alittle while and play nice, this game
will be over in 1912 or so with a RTF draw.
I do not have blinders on about Andy and I would engage him as an ally only
cautiously. But he has every reason to want to fight *Turkey* - not you -
and he can't really fight France right now, without crippling me, thus
benefitting the RT even more.
This is not good. Andy is well situated to push East - to his natural
target, Turkey - but if he waits a phase or two, as you seem to prefer, he
may not be in such a good position, and may not be able to help you. You
will be the first to go.
> Also, does your word carry any weight with Jason? It would
> be interesting to have him start thinking to break off the RT,
> so it's easier to convince him to do so later on.
Jason listens but he doesn't take my advice. Lately he doesn't have much
to say, either. . .
In this position, as in most, you must choose from among a selection of
imperfect options. Choose wisely.
Ben
Message from Russia to all
Everyone,
Sometime Thursday afternoon I was hit hard by a bug (cold or flu) of
somesort which completely wiped me out. I've been pretty much out of
commission for the last 48-60ish hours. I'll try to catch up with
communications tonight and tomorrow, but wanted to let folks know that I'm
not intentionally ignoring anyone.
--- Eric
Message from Russia to Austria
Philippe,
>I thought we had changed tactic and that the goal of getting
>you in Rum was to see you build a fleet. Instead, you opt
>to build two armies.
Sorry, I had gotten the distinct impression that you preferred that Jason
and I cooperate. After taking Rum, we talked, and right near the deadline
he agreed to build F Smy. With that, I changed my build from F Sev to A Sev.
> You may say they aren't aimed at me,
>but if your goal was to expand in the north, why not build a
>fleet in Stp?
Part of that was the last minute change from Turkey. I did not want to
build two fleets, because I think it is bad policy for Russia to have more
fleets than armies in the early game. With F Sev as an assumed build, that
left out F StP. While I did think about changing things around after I
switched to A Sev, I had already convinced myself that F StP was a bad
thing. Granted, that's mostly irrelevant with A Sev, but that was the thinking.
>Hopefully, this will make thing easier with Andy, but one
>thing is sure, I don't want you in Boh.
Again, I thought that we had agreed that seeing IT fight was good for both
of us, and my builds, along with the expected F Smy, were largely intended
to make sure that Andy wouldn't think he could gain control of the
situation in and around your centers. Without your request, I will not be
moving to Boh (and I didn't really expect you'd want me to).
Both I and T continue to ask me to make moves that would allow them to take
Ser, which leads me to believe that Andy is still looking to expand quickly
through the Balkans, though I can see other reasons they each might ask for
those moves as well. What are you hearing from the two of them.
>In fact, I will be
>keeping watch on what you do with all those armies.
I wouldn't expect anything else.
--- Eric
Message from Italy to Austria and Germany
Are we all ok with Philippe's plan.
I am, but things have been quiet for the last few days, so I thought I
would check in.
Andy
Message from France to Austria
Well, I'm not in a position to take on Italy right now, I can tell you that
much. Too much going on with England and Germany and Russia. If I can do
something diplomatically to improve your sitution, though, I'm happy to do
so. F Mar is primarily there to keep Italy in line.
In a year or two, though, who knows? A move on Italy might be palatable.
Really, we should've struck early when I was in position, but such is
life.
If you have a specific plan that involve A Mar, I'm willing to listen to
that, too.
Erik
Message from Austria to Germany and Italy
> Are we all ok with Philippe's plan.
>
> I am, but things have been quiet for the last few days, so I thought I
> would check in.
I was waiting to see if you were ok with my plan and
presume it's the same with Tony. If you feel my plan
is ok as is, then I also confirm my participation and
await Tony's confirmation.
Philippe.
P.-S. What your take on the RT's moves?
Message from Austria to France
> Well, I'm not in a position to take on Italy right now, I can tell you that
> much. Too much going on with England and Germany and Russia. If I can do
> something diplomatically to improve your sitution, though, I'm happy to do
> so. F Mar is primarily there to keep Italy in line.
>
> In a year or two, though, who knows? A move on Italy might be palatable.
> Really, we should've struck early when I was in position, but such is
> life.
OK. When you are ready to do so, let me know.
At least, your fleets will keep the pressure up on
him.
Philippe
Message from Austria to England
Hi Ben,
Sorry for the misunderstanding, but when I asked you to wait,
I only meant a few days to see if it was really necessary after
your initial approach. I was simply afraid that Andy would feel
pressured into doing something against his will and decide to
attack me out of spite.
I realise that I can't really afford to fight with him and if I can
believe what I have receive from him, so does he. So, it seem
that whatever you sent him was well received and I could only
wish it was the same for Jason.
Thank you for your effort on my behalf,
Philippe.
P.-S. How is it going on your side? Any chances of Russia
taking a hit in the north soon?
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
> Sorry for the misunderstanding, but when I asked you to wait,
> I only meant a few days to see if it was really necessary after
> your initial approach. I was simply afraid that Andy would feel
> pressured into doing something against his will and decide to
> attack me out of spite.
I honestly was not sure what you meant but I did not want to take a chance.
Sorry if I laid it on too thick. . .
> I realise that I can't really afford to fight with him and if I can
> believe what I have receive from him, so does he. So, it seem
> that whatever you sent him was well received and I could only
> wish it was the same for Jason.
:-) I've pressured Jason many times to attack Russia. You can see the good
it's doing. . .
> Thank you for your effort on my behalf,
You are welcome.
> P.-S. How is it going on your side? Any chances of Russia
> taking a hit in the north soon?
In the far north - not particularly likely. I am not as equipped as I would
like to be. I am trying with diplomacy to limit his growth. It might help
for you to let *France* know you are concerned about Russia coming over the
top, if you haven't yet.
As I've written you already, Italy can help you against Russia, if you will
let him go VEN - TYR - BOH, etc. We /are/ dealing with Andy, so there is
some risk, and you will have to decide for yourself the best course of
action.
Good luck, my friend.
Ben
Message from Austria to Russia
> Sorry, I had gotten the distinct impression that you preferred that Jason
> and I cooperate. After taking Rum, we talked, and right near the deadline
> he agreed to build F Smy. With that, I changed my build from F Sev to A Sev.
I'm glad you were able to get Jason on your side, but
where you able to send him against Andy, not me?
> Part of that was the last minute change from Turkey. I did not want to
> build two fleets, because I think it is bad policy for Russia to have more
> fleets than armies in the early game. With F Sev as an assumed build, that
> left out F StP. While I did think about changing things around after I
> switched to A Sev, I had already convinced myself that F StP was a bad
> thing. Granted, that's mostly irrelevant with A Sev, but that was the thinking.
Surely, you realise how this look from my point of view.
> Again, I thought that we had agreed that seeing IT fight was good for both
> of us, and my builds, along with the expected F Smy, were largely intended
> to make sure that Andy wouldn't think he could gain control of the
> situation in and around your centers. Without your request, I will not be
> moving to Boh (and I didn't really expect you'd want me to).
OK. Will see how this work out.
> Both I and T continue to ask me to make moves that would allow them to take
> Ser, which leads me to believe that Andy is still looking to expand quickly
> through the Balkans, though I can see other reasons they each might ask for
> those moves as well. What are you hearing from the two of them.
Are you telling me that I only manage to improve your
position within an IRT vs A alliance? I really hope it's not
the case. Andy is being friendly, but it doesn't really mean
anything.
Regards,
Philippe
Message from Germany to Austria and Italy
I am at work and will study the map later this evening and mail you guys.
Going to SIL/BOH will mean certain death. I dont recall all moves but BUD - GAL supported by VIE has my preference.
Message from Austria to England
> like to be. I am trying with diplomacy to limit his growth. It might help
> for you to let *France* know you are concerned about Russia coming over the
> top, if you haven't yet.
Are you telling me that France intend to split up Germany
with Russia? It's hard to think of a worst situation for both
of us.
Philippe
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
> Are you telling me that France intend to split up Germany
> with Russia? It's hard to think of a worst situation for both
> of us.
They have both approached me about it. The of course have also both
promised me a piece of the pie, which is precisely the reason I asked you to
caution France about the danger of a growing Russia. I am worried about
getting squeezed. . .
Ben
Message from Austria to England
> They have both approached me about it. The of course have also both
> promised me a piece of the pie, which is precisely the reason I asked you to
> caution France about the danger of a growing Russia. I am worried about
> getting squeezed. . .
With France at 6 and Russia at 7, any cooperation between those
two mean you are allready being squeezed. For God's sake, you
are still at three because of last year.
It look like you're in the same situation with Tony as I am with
Andy, so if you want me to try to return the favor, let me know. I
can't promise anything, but I owe it to you.
Philippe
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
> With France at 6 and Russia at 7, any cooperation between those
> two mean you are allready being squeezed. For God's sake, you
> are still at three because of last year.
Well, you don't have to rub it in. . . :-)
> It look like you're in the same situation with Tony as I am with
> Andy, so if you want me to try to return the favor, let me know. I
> can't promise anything, but I owe it to you.
Hmm. Let me see how this next season goes. I think my situation may not be
as desperate as yours, but I could be wrong.
Ben
Message from Austria to England
> Well, you don't have to rub it in. . . :-)
Sorry, I was thinking about France. With a good ally
like you, his job should be to have you get back to the
same level of sc as he, not share some with your enemy.
> Hmm. Let me see how this next season goes. I think my situation may not be
> as desperate as yours, but I could be wrong.
Your call. As for France, how do you think I should
approach him. If he's close to Russia, everything I
say to him migth only incite Russia to eliminate me
more quickly.
Philippe
Message from England to Austria
Philippe -
> > Well, you don't have to rub it in. . . :-)
>
> Sorry, I was thinking about France. With a good ally
> like you, his job should be to have you get back to the
> same level of sc as he, not share some with your enemy.
That's what I'm hoping.
> > Hmm. Let me see how this next season goes. I think my
> situation may not be
> > as desperate as yours, but I could be wrong.
>
> Your call. As for France, how do you think I should
> approach him. If he's close to Russia, everything I
> say to him migth only incite Russia to eliminate me
> more quickly.
That's true, but there are some things you could say that would be harmless
if repeated: "Russia is too big; I'm worried England won't be able to hold
him if he makes a push across the top; I am trying to get Andy to go east
but if he stabs me then most of my dots will go to Russia," stuff like that,
colored to match your ongoing correspondence.
Good luck.
Ben
Message from Russia to Austria
Ben,
>I'm glad you were able to get Jason on your side, but
>where you able to send him against Andy, not me?
That was what my understanding was when the builds were agreed to. However,
see below.
> > Part of that was the last minute change from Turkey. I did not want to
> > build two fleets, because I think it is bad policy for Russia to have more
> > fleets than armies in the early game. With F Sev as an assumed build, that
> > left out F StP. While I did think about changing things around after I
> > switched to A Sev, I had already convinced myself that F StP was a bad
> > thing. Granted, that's mostly irrelevant with A Sev, but that was the
> thinking.
>
>Surely, you realise how this look from my point of view.
Absolutely. I don't really expect you to put to much faith in it, which is
what I meant by the "Granted, that's mostly irrelevant..." statement. I was
just sharing the thinking.
> > Both I and T continue to ask me to make moves that would allow them to take
> > Ser, which leads me to believe that Andy is still looking to expand quickly
> > through the Balkans, though I can see other reasons they each might ask for
> > those moves as well. What are you hearing from the two of them.
>
>Are you telling me that I only manage to improve your
>position within an IRT vs A alliance? I really hope it's not
>the case. Andy is being friendly, but it doesn't really mean
>anything.
What I'm saying (poorly) is that I thought that F Smy was something that
would cause I and T to start fighting. What I'm hearing now is that despite
that build Andy and Jason have agreed to honor their previously arranged
deal, where Andy gets Ser and Jason gets Gre. One of IT MUST be planning to
stab the other (I cannot imagine that Andy will give up Gre if he is not
forced to), but neither of them is telling me about it.
So I guess what I'm saying is that what I expected was that I had set Jason
against Andy, but from what they are telling now me I was incorrect. In
which case, you are right, not building F Sev is really a problem for you,
whatever my intentions were.
--- Eric
Message from Germany to Austria and Italy
I have looked at the map and have decided the following.
I am in big poo, bigger poo than you two.
SUrvive this year with me and we can look at next year. Good luck.
Message from Austria to Germany and Italy
> I have looked at the map and have decided the following.
> I am in big poo, bigger poo than you two.
> SUrvive this year with me and we can look at next year. Good luck.
Wich mean...
Philippe
Message from Germany to Austria and Italy
Which mean that I need all my units. I am looking at losing DEN, HOL, MUN
just for starters.
I could bounce BOH/SIL but this would cost me DEN, HOL and MUN for sure.
For it to really work I would need to see VEN - TYR, BUD - GAL supported by
VIE. Me to BOH and SIL and the promise for what it is worth in diplomacy
that you guys help me retake MUN. Ormaybe even MUN - SIL supported by BER.
Message from Italy to Austria and Germany
>
> Which mean that I need all my units. I am looking at losing DEN, HOL, MUN
> just for starters.
> I could bounce BOH/SIL but this would cost me DEN, HOL and MUN for sure.
> For it to really work I would need to see VEN - TYR, BUD - GAL supported by
> VIE. Me to BOH and SIL and the promise for what it is worth in diplomacy
> that you guys help me retake MUN. Ormaybe even MUN - SIL supported by BER.
Ok....somehow I deleted the moves that Philippe suggested, can you resend
them to me.
Tonys message has confuse me a bit.
Andy
Message from Germany to Austria and Italy
> Tonys message has confuse me a bit.>
This is not unusual, you get used to it ;-)
I also dont recall philippes moves off hand but I do recall him not hitting
GAL with two units. Something I think needs doing although I am expecting
Russia to hit GAL with two units too.
But hurry I have already submitted some other crap moves in my battle
against EFR up north and west.
Message from Germany to Austria and Italy
Guys it is bed time here. We are not going to be able to negotiate final
moves before the deadline.
My orders are in, let us hope one of the others is late so that we can
negotiate further. For now I am just thinking of myself. I have not ordered
to PRU or SIL or BOH.
Message from Austria to Germany and Italy
> > Tonys message has confuse me a bit.>
>
> This is not unusual, you get used to it ;-)
>
> I also dont recall philippes moves off hand but I do recall him not hitting
> GAL with two units. Something I think needs doing although I am expecting
> Russia to hit GAL with two units too.
> But hurry I have already submitted some other crap moves in my battle
> against EFR up north and west.
Guys, thanks for the discussion! Out of the blue, one confirm
his participation and the other prefer his own plan, but both
don't know what my original plan was. Got to love you ;-)
Now I don't know what I will be doing and the only thing I
ask from Andy is that he vacate Venice to turn it into a dmz.
Philippe
Message from Austria to Austria
I'm in so much trouble that I don't care to examine it in details.
I thought my plan was interesting; but instead of discussing it,
Tony simply went from cheering us up to going at it alone and
Andy suddenly confirm his part only to tell us that he doesn't
know what he's suppose to do. In short, I & G got better offer
wich they trust and I can't trust anyone around me.
Since I don't know what will happen with Andy, I'm sending
my fleet to Alb to protect Tri and make a move on Greece;
but the most important move is Ser-Rum supported by Bud
to interfere with a switch of units in Rum, Vie going to Tri for
a possible bounce.
Message from Italy to Austria and Germany
> Guys, thanks for the discussion! Out of the blue, one confirm
> his participation and the other prefer his own plan, but both
> don't know what my original plan was. Got to love you ;-)
>
Philippe,
I have astrong idea of what your plan is, I just dont have the original
email, and I want to do what I said I would do.
And Tony confused the hell out of me.
Austria: Fleet Adriatic Sea → Albania (*bounce*)
Austria: Army Budapest SUPPORT Army Serbia → Rumania (*cut*)
Austria: Army Serbia → Rumania (*bounce, destroyed*)
Austria: Army Vienna → Trieste (*bounce*)
England: Fleet London → North Sea
England: Fleet North Sea → Denmark
England: Fleet Skagerrak SUPPORT Fleet North Sea → Denmark
France: Army Belgium → Holland
France: Army Burgundy SUPPORT Army Ruhr → Munich
France: Fleet Marseilles HOLD
France: Army Paris → Burgundy (*bounce*)
France: Fleet Portugal → Mid-Atlantic Ocean
France: Army Ruhr → Munich (*bounce, dislodged*)
Germany: Army Berlin SUPPORT Army Munich
Germany: Fleet Denmark → Sweden (*bounce, dislodged*)
Germany: Army Holland → Ruhr
Germany: Army Kiel SUPPORT Army Holland → Ruhr
Germany: Army Munich SUPPORT Army Holland → Ruhr
Italy: Army Greece → Serbia
Italy: Fleet Ionian Sea → Albania (*bounce*)
Italy: Army Rome → Venice (*bounce*)
Italy: Fleet Tunis → Ionian Sea (*bounce*)
Italy: Army Venice → Trieste (*bounce*)
Russia: Army Galicia → Budapest (*bounce*)
Russia: Army Norway → Sweden (*bounce*)
Russia: Fleet Rumania → Sevastopol (*bounce*)
Russia: Army Sevastopol → Ukraine (*bounce*)
Russia: Fleet Sweden → Baltic Sea
Russia: Army Ukraine → Rumania (*bounce*)
Russia: Army Warsaw → Silesia
Turkey: Fleet Black Sea SUPPORT Army Bulgaria
Turkey: Army Bulgaria SUPPORT Italian Army Greece → Serbia
Turkey: Army Constantinople SUPPORT Army Bulgaria
Turkey: Fleet Smyrna → Aegean Sea
|