|
|
Message from Italy to France
>
> I understand that you are upset with my being in the
> Mediterranean.
>
Not in the least. I'm more disappointed in the approach you took.
> I thought that there was a real chance at a bounce.
There was. I eventually decided to give you some respect.
> It was also a requirement from both England and
> Germany to help me in the North.
>
Here is where you're going to lose me. You chose to deceive me this fall
rather than England or Germany. I think you could have found a way to gain
Belgium and maintained our treaty in the West Med.
> Given where I am, there is no certainty that a war
> between us inevitable. What can you do to alleviate all
> the concerns? My units could easily shift another
> direction, especially in the spring.
>
I'm willing to give you a second chance to regain my faith in you. If you
can provide me with a set of orders to gain me my 10th center (not just a
very good chance but rather a virtual guarantee), then I will hand Tunis
over to you. That would put us at 9/7 with you having excellent growth
potential in the north. If, on the other hand, you decide to make this a
full fledge war between us, then I will of course dig my heels in and the
only powers who will gain from our battle will be England and Turkey. The
ball is really in your court.
Life is Beautiful,
Roberto
Message from England to France
Prince Boar,
>But we both could have
>betrayed each other last year. We can do so again.
I would not be insulted if you protected Brest or Paris or
both. Disappointed a wee bit, but not insulted. They do look terribly
exposed. Protecting one or both would slow down the offense.
Taking our time against Germany is no problem, but I hope that Italy
doesn't squirm out of his dilemma. By building an army, he has decided to
protect Piedmont himself and not rely on Germany. Thus he will be weakest
at sea. You may get Tunis, but he doesn't actually need Tunis to form a
defense line. He has greater problems in the north, even with his new
army. Once you are in both Marseilles and Lyon, he will have difficulty
holding both Piedmont and Tuscany.
>You know, I did not think about another choice for last
>year:
>Bel -> Ruh s by Bur
>Pic -> Bel s by Eng
>This would have protected Belgium and provided a better
>spot for your army. Of course hindsight! I only have
>two weeks to think of it, but I was not really thinking
>about the game much.
I am notoriously blind when it comes to basic tactics. I offered you
Belgium not even realizing that my army could be saved. When you pointed
out that Picardy could be a refuge I was delighted. I, too, never saw the
above maneuver that would have put my army in Ruhr.
Ivy
Message from France to England
Ivy:
(Warning this is long.)
>Anyway, given your weird position this turn,
>I am ready to agree to anything that you propose.
Yes, I am feeling quite a bit exposed. I worry that I
will do the dirty work distracting Italy and basically
getting nowhere, while you will grab a couple quick
centers from Germany. Then you stab me. Suddenly you
look large. About the only thing that I have going for
me is that Russia, Germany and I together can still make
you vulnerable. And I can go back to defending against
only you. I hope that you will understand my concern.
Given that dangerous situation, I have been extremely
trusting of you, the decision to let you stay in Picardy
and the Channel is an example. I am placing a lot of
long term trust in you. Together I think that we can
take over more than half the board and both be better off
in the long run. I will continue to trust you, but will
try to exercise a little caution.
Having said that, I realize that I am long overdue on
saying something else:
Thank you!!!!
I appreciate your letting me have Belgium. Without it I
would look pretty shaky in the Mediterranean and Italy
might be able to make progress against both Turkey and I.
With this extra unit, I have a chance at getting
somewhere against Italy. In the short term, it would
likely only be Tunis. But as Turkey presses him, things
will open up. I do expect him to focus more on me than
Turkey, since he is angry with me.
Hence Turkey will get larger. So we need to prop up
Russia to give him something to worry about. Given
their history, it will just be a matter of time before
they are fighting. New builds that you help Russia take
can be placed in the south?
As for the moves for this year. I ask for Pic -> Hol.
The reason is that I want *my* army in Burgundy for the
fall. I want the option to cover Marseilles in the fall
with that Army. It also gives me more peace of mind to
not have you in both Bur and the Channel. I am also
probably not going to order Burgundy to Ruhr. I simple
cannot risk having Germany get into Burgundy. The
advantage of your getting another unit is not worth the
risk to me. Right now you really do not need that extra
unit, therefore the potential gain is small compared to
the risk. I will instead order it to Munich. This
should prevent Tyr -> Mun, which will help us in the long
run. Is all this acceptable to you? In other words, can
you live with it?
To answer some old comments and questions:
>That was one of the most rambling, incoherent discourses
Rambling! I am soooo insulted! OK, maybe it was
rambling, but no more so than my usual symposium. I have
my wity commentary, my State of the Union section, my
philosophy discourse, that I try to tie into the game.
What really surprised me is that you actually read enough
of it to have an opinion on whether it was rambling! I
just assume that everyone hit delete when they see the
title. Come on, was none of it humorous? Ever?
Actually they are getting too long, but I cannot figure
out how to shorten them. I will work on it.
>By amazing coincidence, I first heard the Descartes
>joke ("I think not") yesterday morning.
Yes that is amazing. First the Baloney connection, then
football obessions, now philosophy jokes. This is scary
:-) We need to meet in a bar when this game ends :-)
Watching football of course.
The joke is probably very old. I read it in the
philosophy book that I got from the library. Yes, I
actually do research on this stuff. What a royal geek!
:-)
>The Steeler victory was OK, but they may have beaten
>the worst team in the NFL.
There is always the Washington Redskins.
>I'm not so sure that the Pack has been tested yet
>either. Still, 3-0 ain't bad against any opposition.
On the one hand, you can't blame them for their
opponent's weaknesses. On the other hand, they have not
played anyone tough enough to know. Next week, the
Buccaneers!
> I am telling them the truth.
I was not asking you to lie about it. I was wondering if
we wanted to just keep people guessing. OK. I can go
around explaining why I am so stupid to my neighbors who
have implied it. :-)
>I think you and I can stay at peace and work with
>Turkey and get the game down to three.
I am all for that. I am even comfortable with that
ending. But we may want to first try to bring the game
down to four (with Russia involved) and hope to exploit
the T-R history. There is no 2-way stalemate between us,
so all we could think about would be a 50-50 shot at the
victory. Well, I am getting ahead of myself.
I am sorry that this is so long. If I rambled, just be
polite and keep it to yourself ;-)
>Then why didn't you select it over France?
I did, but you selected England first and I had to settle
for my second choice! ;-)
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Italy
Roberto:
>I think you could have found a way to gain
>Belgium and maintained our treaty in the West Med.
Ah but neither would agree to work with me in the long
term to eliminate the other, unless I agree to throw some
forces your way. I could not go it alone against them
and leave myself exposed to your growing might with
limited things to do with all those new forces.
I guess that I could have asked you to start waiving
builds. Or encouraged you to go north after Germany.
But every time that you could have helped me against
Germany, you said that you could not. You did help me
against England, so I should have given you at least a
chance to find a solution. I apologize for that.
So in that light, let's try to find a solution before it
is too late.
Speaking of which:
>I'm willing to give you a second chance to regain
>my faith in you. If you can provide me with a set of
>orders to gain me my 10th center
A challenge for the Dauphin! I will have him study the
board. Would my supporting you to Munich count?
(armies in Boh and Tyr would be nice) Or does it have to
be a set of orders which you can execute alone?
How would we set up a reasonable, but limited border
defense in the Mediterranean?
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Germany
Fredd:
Yes, I suggested to England that he convoy to Picardy.
This was better than his holding in Belgium and
supporting it from the Channel. I could have hit the
Channel, but risked England sneaking into the
Mid-Atlantic Ocean. It also afforded me the oppotunity
to bounce the army in Picardy and destroy it. But since
I did not think that you were holding in Ruhr, this was
not possible. In hind sight, I should have done that; I
would have preferred him in your hair in Ruhr and not in
mine. I will have to work on the path I chose, a
diplomatic solution. Yikes!
I did build the fleet as promised. I will need to focus
on Italy. I do not see how we can work together on that,
nor on England. If you have any bright ideas, I am
listening.
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Turkey
Ali:
Hello again. I finally have gotten a free moment to
write. I thought that we could talk about long term
plans. We need to work together to try and balance
England and Russia. I am sure that you would prefer a
stronger England and I would prefer a stronger Russia.
But if we want to improve our long term positions, we
should try to balance them. If one is too weak, the other
probably will not attack in fear that you or I would
gobble them up from behind. Hence, we want them even.
If we can then get them fighting, we can join together
and advance towards the end game. We have the option for
a two-way draw, which allows the game to come towards the
end. One may steal the victory, but that is still a
50-50 shot. The other option is likely a 3-way draw,
which is less palatable. I know that I am bold even
suggesting that I could get to that point, but it does
not hurt to dream and plan.
What do I suggest this turn? Not too much to cooperate
on. I am just asking for us to agree to work slowly
towards splitting Europe and seeing what happens. We
have gotten along quite well. I have helped you out
several times, giving you the information or assurances
to yourself or others. You helped to negotiate
cooperation between England and I. We are like brothers
and need to remember that! (I can't believe that I am
writing this sappy stuff)
OK, enough of that. Do you agree to work towards that
future? If you do agree, I will agree to stop writing
such sappy messages. If you don't I will drown you in so
much sugar and sentiment you may melt! :-)
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Russia
Nick:
I believe that Ivy is going to help you get St. Petes. I
am encouraging that. I need a strong Russia to balance a
growing England (and Turkey). I am a bit worried that
Turkey could try to pull a fast one (help Germany). What
do you get from that side of the board? I am trying to
convince Turkey that he needs a viable Russia.
I see no opportunities for us to work together. I look
foward to a time when you can make England nervous in
Scandinavia and weaken Italy. I have a long road ahead
of me.
--Xavier
Message from Germany to France
No bright ideas here. I already have orders in to support you in
Belgium. I'm assuming that you're not going to be attacking Munich or
Ruhr. You're way too wide open if you move that army east. Other than
that there's not much we need to discuss.
Fredd
Message from England to France
I just finished waching SF-Jets. The wife went to bed a couple of hours
ago, and I better head that way also. We usually get up around 6.
>>Anyway, given your weird position this turn,
>>I am ready to agree to anything that you propose.
>Yes, I am feeling quite a bit exposed.
I am far more trusting than good ol' Fredd, but I think you have me beat in
the trusting department.
>Thank you!!!!
No problem. I suppose, to take a dim view, that this decision like all
others in Diplomacy was ultimately selfish. Had Italy gotten his stalemate
line while crushing Turkey, then you, Germany, Russia and I would have been
left to divide up the crumbs. I didn't like my chances at all in that
scenerio, short term or long term.
> With this extra unit, I have a chance at getting
>somewhere against Italy. In the short term, it would
>likely only be Tunis.
It's going to be interesting. We will see how well Italy can defend. He
doesn't really need Tunis to set up a wall against you, but he does need
greater strength in the north. I think he desperately needs one more
center from Turkey and those prospects are 50-50 at best this year.
>As for the moves for this year. I ask for Pic -> Hol.
Done. Now I can enter my moves. The two fleets will convoy Picardy to
Holland and Norway bumps StP to help Russia. Of course, Belgium will be
supporting Pic->Holland. Right?
>Is all this acceptable to you?
Absolutely. We both will be far better off than we were one year ago.
>>By amazing coincidence, I first heard the Descartes
>>joke ("I think not") yesterday morning.
>Yes that is amazing. First the Baloney connection,
What was the Baloney connection? I don't remember.
> ... We need to meet in a bar when this game ends :-)
Ugh. I don't like beer. That's why I will never be a good face-to-face
player. Wine is OK, but for the most part I am rather square.
>>I think you and I can stay at peace and work with
>>Turkey and get the game down to three.
>I am all for that. I am even comfortable with that
>ending. But we may want to first try to bring the game
>down to four (with Russia involved) and hope to exploit
>the T-R history.
You and I will have to discuss this very carefully as Germany disappears.
As Italy has just learned, no one will be able to run away with this game.
It's musical chairs and I do hope that after Germany goes, either Russia or
Italy will be next.
>There is no 2-way stalemate between us,
Well, you could give me France and Iberia and shift your units east to take
the eastern 17. 8-)
Don't think about these things now. We both can improve our chances
considerably by working together. Besides, a 2-way doesn't have to be
along a stalemate line. I would like to say a little about my history, but
gunboat prohibits it.
>>Then why didn't you select it over France?
>I did, but you selected England first and I had to settle
>for my second choice! ;-)
Sure, sure. He smiles and winks.
Ivy
Message from France to England
Ivy
>what was the Baloney connection? I don't remember.
The Dauphin's ditty, My balone has a first name ....
Your wife being named Mayer? :-)
I will of course be supporting Pic to Bel! No worries
about that mate.
--Prince Boar
PS: I will be unavailalbe all day, but should be around
late tonight.
Message from Italy to France
> Would my supporting you to Munich count?
Anything would count. Support into Munich would be ideal. I have no
sympathy for Mr Fredd.
> How would we set up a reasonable, but limited border
> defense in the Mediterranean?
>
Depends on what you mean by limited. How many units are we talking about?
If you're in Tunis, I'll want at least a fleet in the Ionean and probably
another one in Rome/Naples. If you can live with fleets in Tun/NAF/MAO
under those scenarios, I think that's about as limited as we can get. To me
the key is nothing in the WES or GOL.
Roberto
Message from Master to all
I'd like to encourage End-Of-Year statements from all the players (in
"press to m" format) and from any interested observers as well (in
posts to the vgfp_titleist Yahoogroup.
Doug
Message from Russia to England and France
>Message from England to Russia in 'titleist':
>
>At France's insistence, I am convoying the army to
>Holland instead of attacking Denmark.
>but he is concerned [I think] by my proximity to
>Brest and Paris. He admits that this provides a weaker attack on Germany
>than we might have had, but I do understand his concern for his own safety.
>From my perspective, ECh S Pic-Bel, Bur S Bel-Ruh,
Swe S Nth-Den still get you out of his hair, and is
far superior, but I can't force you two to listen
to me. Prince Boar, what problem do you see with
taking Ruhr this Spring?
Your Friend,
Nick.
Message from England to France
Prince Boar,
>Message from Russia to England and France in 'titleist':
>
> >Message from England to Russia in 'titleist':
> >
> >At France's insistence, I am convoying the army to
> >Holland instead of attacking Denmark.
> >but he is concerned [I think] by my proximity to
> >Brest and Paris. He admits that this provides a weaker attack on Germany
> >than we might have had, but I do understand his concern for his own safety.
I will be asking Nick, as politely as I can, to avoid quoting me to a third
party. I won't say "never," but I am sure you understand the principle
involved. Had I been writing to you, I hope I would not have used the word
"insistence." Our agreement on the moves was reached painlessly. As I
said to Nick (in a fuller context that he did not quote), I DO understand
your concern on this turn in particular. The exposed centers in Paris and
Brest are so obvious -- the "elephant" in the conversation, as they say.
> >From my perspective, ECh S Pic-Bel, Bur S Bel-Ruh,
>Swe S Nth-Den still get you out of his hair, and is
>far superior, but I can't force you two to listen
>to me. Prince Boar, what problem do you see with
>taking Ruhr this Spring?
I really had to smile when I read this. There was a player in my semifinal
who was never content with my suggestions when we were allied. He always
had something better and would argue his point endlessly. May be the same
person. Nick drove me crazy when he was trying to dictate my moves after
he went Moscow->StP at the beginning of the game. No matter. I will be
able to work with Nick, at least until Germany disappears.
Ivy
Message from France to England and Russia
Nick, Ivy:
I am a bit uncomfortable walking out of a center that
England will fill, given my extreme amount of exposure.
There would be no guarantee of my taking a center to
replace it and I cannot afford to have only 1 center
guarding my entire homeland. The move to Holland takes
one Germany center. St. Petes will also fall this year.
There is less of a chance to take a third German center
this year, but either way 3 were probably not guaranteed.
The bottom line is that I have my hands full with Italy
and I do not mind Germany taking a bit of time to
eliminate. I also feel more comfortable disentangling
England and my forces.
I hope that Nick can bear with us. I have a lot of
Italian units to deal with down here. It is more
important to prevent his getting even larger than
crushing Germany in record time. Savor the steady
crushing of Germany Nick, savor it.
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Italy
Roberto:
I believe that I can live with the fleet scheme that you
suggested. I would probably need to ask for an elaborate
set of bounces, so that you did not sneak into the
Tyrrhenian Sea. The other option would be for me to have
my fleet in Spa (sc) rather than MAO. I am sure that you
would want a third fleet hanging around somewhere. Where
would it be?
So if you end up in Bohemia and Tyrolia, I can support
you to Munich in exchange for Tunis. Alternatively we
could discuss your supporting me to Munich instead of
Tunis. We could then fall back on the Gibraltar and
Tyrrhenian Sea stalemate regions. We can discuss in the
fall.
You also have a 50-50 shot at taking a Turkish center.
Would that count for your guaranteed center?
--Prince Boar
Message from France to England
Ivy
I did raise my eyebrows at the insistence when I first
read Nick's note. But I shrugged it off as just the
normal diplomatic pictures that we paint to different
parties. I urged politely, you agreed graciously. My
reasons were for more than just separating our forces.
There were as much for the more flexible attack against
Italy. But I choose not to mention that to Nick. I
trust that you are not doing so as well.
>Nick drove me crazy when he was trying to dictate my
>moves …
Germany had similar comments a couple of seasons ago. I
smile because I had the same troubles when you were
attacking me. He is very stubborn and refuses to ever
see something that you feel is obvious. I prefer working
with someone who is willing to consider all options and
compromise to find the best one. But I agree, we can
work with Nick. You have the challenges not me. :-) At
least this may help keep us united, preferring to work
with each other than with Russia. ;-)
--Prince Boar
Message from Russia to England and France
> I hope that Nick can bear with us. I have a lot of
> Italian units to deal with down here. It is more
> important to prevent his getting even larger than
> crushing Germany in record time. Savor the steady
> crushing of Germany Nick, savor it.
Obviously, I'm not in a position to insist on anything,
but those Italian Units are fully engaged with Turkey,
while I have to worry about GT cooperation, so I view
rapid German destruction as a plus. ;^} Speaking of
GIT, has anyone heard from them since the game
started again?
Nick.
Message from England to France and Russia
> Speaking of
>GIT, has anyone heard from them since the game
>started again?
Germany, no.
Turkey, yes, but it wasn't his best effort. He simply asked if I were at
war once again with France. I would have expected him to be delighted with
events and to resume diplomacy with renewed vigor. His prospects are now
much brighter. Even though he doesn't need to coordinate any moves, he
should be constantly cultivating friends.
Italy, yes. Immediately after the moves, which surely took him by
surprise, he wrote me. Surely, he said, you [England] are not going to
let France and Germany and Turkey grow at the expense of Italy. In my
response I told him that Germany would not be growing at the expense of
Italy. 8-) I said that I hoped that balance would soon be restored to the
game -- an obvious reference to Italy's threatened dominance. I thought
my note was polite. He hasn't written back. In his position I would find
lots to say.
Ivy
Message from Turkey to France
Prince Boar,
Thanks for your letter. I agree entirely with everything you said. Indeed,
I've got some concerns with Russia growing strong, since it's likely that he
still bears me some grudges for my earlier transgressions. Likewise, I'm sure
you feel the same way about England. Although, I thought it was a good sign
that he was willing to give up Belgium to bolster your Med forces (or at least
that's how I interpret last fall's moves).
As for keeping E/R under control, I have little to offer. Tactically, my
efforts will be 100% focused on Italy, and I don't envision that changing real
soon. With your much-needed (and much-welcomed) fleet pressure, I don't think
Italy can hold out forever. But he is certainly strong, and it will take a
while to whittle him down. I don't think I'll be making any great leaps
forward in center counts, and in fact I have no real desire to do so anyway.
But if we can both grow slowly and steadily, then I'm confident we will
prevail.
About the only possible thing I can see to restrict E/R would be to support
Germany. I had mentioned to Fredd that I might be willing to support A Tyr
against Vie or something, but he has not replied. I think he's upset with me
for refusing to support him against Russia last year. What is your viewpoint,
are you planning to actively participate in anti-German efforts? If Germany
does request support against Vie, would you object to such a thing?
In any case, thanks again for your note (including the "sappy stuff" -- sappy
or not, it's always good to hear). I get the feeling we're pretty much on the
same page; now we just need to make it all happen. My moves for the spring
will look a lot like last fall's moves. I'm clearly in defense mode until
something starts to give in Italy's position. If you have any specific
suggestion, your thoughts are always welcome. Very best of luck to you in
your Mediterranean endeavors; the Turkish people will be cheering every French
advance.
Best regards,
Ali
Message from Italy to France
> The other option would be for me to have
> my fleet in Spa (sc) rather than MAO.
>
That would be fine. I almost suggested that but thought you might want to
actually be in the MAO to stop England from getting there. I guess it all
depends on how successful you are in getting to England.
> I am sure that you would want a third fleet hanging
> around somewhere. Where would it be?
>
Not sure. Where would you want it to be? I imagine Apulia would be a
legitimate counter to Spain/sc. It wouldn't have to be on the Western side
of the Ionean though.
> So if you end up in Bohemia and Tyrolia, I can support
> you to Munich in exchange for Tunis. Alternatively we
> could discuss your supporting me to Munich instead of
> Tunis. We could then fall back on the Gibraltar and
> Tyrrhenian Sea stalemate regions. We can discuss in the
> fall.
>
> You also have a 50-50 shot at taking a Turkish center.
> Would that count for your guaranteed center?
>
I've looked at the map and I really don't think I can get to BOH/TYR and
still have a 50-50 shot at a Turkish center. Truth be told, I'm not really
interested in another Turkish center. I'm really only interested in keeping
him in his corner.
Germany made mention that he will be moving Tyrolia north this spring. That
must mean that he'll also be moving Munich. It would help me greatly in
getting to BOH/TYR if his moves were to succeed. In other words, I would
kindly ask that you not interfere in any German moves to Ruhr or Munich this
spring. I'm not sure he's going to move Mun-Ruh but it's certainly a
possibility.
Life is Beautiful,
Roberto
Message from Turkey to England and France
Gentlemen,
I'm just writing to express my sincere thanks and continued support for your
renewed spirit of cooperation. I hope and expect that as events unfold, the
two of you will enjoy a strong and mutually beneficial alliance. I recall the
situation just a year ago, when I first wrote to encourage your cease-fire.
The board I see before me now is more promising than I had dared hope. Italy
remains a real threat, and he won't be easy to take down. But the odds are on
our side, and the situation is far, far more promising now. Again, thank you.
Best regards to you both,
Ali
Message from France to England and Russia
I had only heard from Germany and Italy, but just heard
from Turkey today.
I tried to send a note earlier, but it failed.
good luck tonight
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Italy
Roberto:
Thanks for your note. We can work out the fleet details
later as there is little time right now. I have been at
a conference the last two days and basically awary from
e-mail.
I understand your request for not interferring with
German moves. I do worry about his having two units to
attack Burgundy. If that was coupled with your being
in Peidmont, I would not like that. But will give your
request serious weight.
Good luck.
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Turkey
Ali:
I have no problems with your helping Germany against
Italy. Just do not help him against Russia. We need
Russia for now. I also want to repeat that we should try
to balance England and Russia. A sign of good faith
between us and necessary to better work toward a path
where Turkey and France dominate and we do not have a
third large party in the way.
Good luck.
--Prince Boar
Message from France to Germany
Fredd:
Thanks for the note. Sorry for the delay in writing
back. I have been at a conference for the last two days.
Turkey did indicate that he wanted to help you against
Italy. I have no problems with that. :-)
Good luck.
--Prince Boar
Message from Italy to France
>
> I understand your request for not interferring with
> German moves. I do worry about his having two units to
> attack Burgundy. If that was coupled with your being
> in Peidmont, I would not like that. But will give your
> request serious weight.
>
Feel free to move your MAR fleet to PIE if that will give you piece of mind.
Roberto
England: Fleet English Channel CONVOY Army Picardy → Holland
England: Fleet North Sea CONVOY Army Picardy → Holland
England: Fleet Norway → St Petersburg (north coast)
England: Army Picardy → English Channel → North Sea → Holland
France: Army Belgium SUPPORT English Army Picardy → Holland
France: Army Burgundy → Munich (*bounce*)
France: Fleet Marseilles → Gulf of Lyon
France: Fleet Mid-Atlantic Ocean → North Africa
France: Fleet Spain (south coast) → Western Mediterranean
France: Fleet Western Mediterranean → Tunis
Germany: Fleet Denmark → North Sea (*bounce*)
Germany: Army Holland SUPPORT French Army Belgium (*cut, dislodged*)
Germany: Army Livonia → Prussia
Germany: Army Munich → Silesia
Germany: Fleet St Petersburg (south coast) → Gulf of Bothnia
Germany: Army Tyrolia → Munich (*bounce*)
Italy: Fleet Aegean Sea → Constantinople (*bounce*)
Italy: Fleet Apulia → Ionian Sea
Italy: Army Budapest → Galicia (*bounce*)
Italy: Fleet Greece → Bulgaria (south coast) (*bounce*)
Italy: Army Serbia SUPPORT Fleet Greece → Bulgaria (south coast)
Italy: Army Trieste → Vienna
Italy: Fleet Tyrrhenian Sea → Rome
Italy: Army Venice → Tyrolia (*bounce*)
Italy: Army Vienna → Bohemia
Russia: Army Moscow → Livonia
Russia: Fleet Sweden → Denmark (*bounce*)
Russia: Army Warsaw SUPPORT Army Moscow → Livonia
Turkey: Fleet Black Sea SUPPORT Army Bulgaria
Turkey: Army Bulgaria SUPPORT Army Sevastopol → Rumania (*cut*)
Turkey: Army Constantinople SUPPORT Army Bulgaria (*cut*)
Turkey: Army Galicia SUPPORT Army Sevastopol → Rumania (*cut*)
Turkey: Army Sevastopol → Rumania
Turkey: Fleet Smyrna → Aegean Sea (*bounce*)
|