|
|
Message from Germany to France
The beauty lies in the simplicity of the moves or did you use reversed psychology?
The fact that MUN could easily have been held led me to believe you wouldn’t attack it, especially not if you were working with England around BEL. In hindsight I understand now why he requested me to move to PIC. I didn’t move there because I was convinced the pair of you was working together and that it therefor was a trap..
Maybe that's why he mentioned it so that I wouldn’t go there. Don’t you just love diplomacy.
OK, MUN can easily be retaken, ruh cuts bur support and I use BER and KIE to retake it.
But for now I am more worried about RT, especially R.
The thing I like about France is the ability to switch direction whenever the need be.
Looking at the board I see several possible means of development.
Either Russia sticks with me (I cut NTH as agreed upon for him building STP) or he supports SKA into DEN.
This may be possible if he wishes that EF remain at equal strength and at some time in the near future turn on each other so that he can concentrate on attaining STP through to TUN. The juggernaut is on.
In the long term this spells trouble for you as Turkey sweeps west. Faced with a strong England and an up and coming Turkey you will have your hands full.
Another development could be that you move to ENG and take BEL. This will set us up for an attack on England next year. I have to retake MUN if only to force EF troops closer together so that you can both fight over BEL/HOL when the time comes. Look at the possibility of pushing MAO - ENG, having BUR take BEL supported by PIC. You get the build you want. In the spring of next year you push ENG - IRI and BRE - ENG or you convoy directly to WAL. I have to retake MUN as suggested as it is guaranteed and you cant stop it. It also concentrates my forces. You will need PIC/BUR to remove BEL and someone would have to prevent the retreat to HOL.
I always play the board as is, it is only the fall of 1902. The spring is always a paranoid time. The dust has settled and we now have to look at meaningful relations without losing overall view of the developments around us. If RG stick together then England is facing a disband. You always have the build from POR to fall back on when needed. Take BEL now and lets work together on removing England..
Let me know your thoughts.
I must admit that I nearly pissed myself laughing after receiving press in 1901 from Russia, Austria and Italy. All wondering why you went to PIE. As stated it was only the spring and for all I know EF could have come after me straight from the gate. Or maybe EG or EF could have came straight out of the gate. That’s what's so annoying about s1901, it can go either way depending on X to the power of 10000 different reasons.
The game is now on, let’s decide what is wise.
Message from England to France
Erik -
Yuck. I was not sure whether to believe Russia; I had decided to go with h=
im when he told *you* he'd be helping me into DEN. Why would he want to st=
art lying to so many, so early? But there it is.
Anyway, what do you think we should do next? =20
Ben
Message from Russia to France
Erik,
I hate having not supported Ben. In the end, my fears about abandoning
Scandinavia were the deciding factor. I'm still very open to supporting
(E)F operations against G, but I am waiting to hear from both of you to see
if that's something I should even bother discussing.
I'm going to be off-line most of the day, but will get back to you when I can.
--- Eric
Message from France to France
Peanut gallery:
What a singularly fascinating turn. From my perspective, I'm neither worse
off or better off, but I am truly surprised that my move to Munich
succeeded. Did Tony know that he could always take it back, or did he
really not see it coming? Everyone else on the board did.
Very clever move by Eric. Not surprising, and all his talk about
Scandanavia was a clear hint at what was coming, but he did well to
telegraph his fake support to Ben through me. Nice job of anticipating my
willingness to share info with my ally.
Russia is in a very good position, as far as I can tell, despite having
looked a little dicey at the opening. Austria's good is clearly cooked --
given his unwillingness to make concrete plans with anyone, this is not
surprising. I wish the Turk were a little more open with me. He one-liners
are just annoying me to the point where communication with him seems
pointless (though I must still try).
England is in trouble; Germany is also not doing terribly well, but could
recover. This is good for me, especially with Russia no longer having to
worry about the south. I don't like the prospect of RT, so I need to make
sure that Andy is working to derail any long-term juggernaut and ensure a
relatively near-term stab of Turkey.
Time to write the others.
Erik
Message from France to Russia
Eric:
Wacky turn. While part of me regrest your decision not to support Ben as
well, part of me thinks it was a really good thing for both of us. I was
clearly in for a long fight against Germany, and Ben might have started
growing before I did, and that would spell problems. Now, both Ben and
Tony are handicapped by our collective moves. If we work this carefully,
we may be able to keep them both small and start mopping up around the
edges. With no sign of Andy heading West in the near term, I think this
may all be for the best.
Nice work with Turkey. I had heard that AT were on the ropes; looks now
like Austria is the odd man out. This, by the way, has provoked more than
one cry of "Juggernaut!" from other players. Is RT something you see
continuing for a while, or just an expedient means to splitting up AT?
I need to look at the board a little more and decide what to do: I can
keep working with Ben against Germany, though he's going to be ineffectual
at best; I could also make peace with Tony and strike at the weaker of my
neighbors. Of course, the only way I could safely do that is if I knew you
were ready to put the vice on Germany when the time came.
Erik
Message from Russia to France
>I was
>clearly in for a long fight against Germany, and Ben might have started
>growing before I did, and that would spell problems.
And that was bad for me as well, because I thought he could get big
enough to start after me while still attacking one of you or Germany.
>Nice work with Turkey. I had heard that AT were on the ropes; looks now
>like Austria is the odd man out. This, by the way, has provoked more than
>one cry of "Juggernaut!" from other players.
I'm sure. And let me guess, Andy, Philippe and Tony are the ones
yelling the loudest!
>Is RT something you see
>continuing for a while, or just an expedient means to splitting up AT?
Look at the board for S02 and take into account the fact that while
Philippe said he would "consider" moving south, he refused to promise
not to enter Gal or use Rum against Sev. Given that negotiating
background, and that I obviously wanted to see Arm removed, ordering
support for Arm-Rum was a no-brainer. The shift of the armies was
more of the "why not bet the farm that he's really going to take it"
variety. I figured that if he did go to Rum, and Philippe didn't
attack me, then I needed to guard against a retreat to Gal. If he did
go to Gal, then I was giving up Sev, but against AT that was going to
be lost come Fall anyway.
I should add that I actually mis-explained myself in my last message
to you. While I did want to get a foothold in Scandinavia, it was
just as much the the belief that I was likely to go down one in the
south (because of the risky moves) that made me feel like a build in
'02 was more important than a promise of one in '03 that I might not
be able to take advantage of.
So in short, that was all desperation, and I need to hear from
everyone before I have any clarity about what comes next.
>Of course, the only way I could safely do that is if I knew you
>were ready to put the vice on Germany when the time came.
FR is very important to me. While emotionally attacking Ben was
difficult, from a dispassionate in-game perspective I was more
worried about what it would do to FR than ER. Germany is going to
spend a lot of time trying to balance you, me and England against
each other. One thing I see is that with my jump in position, I'd
like to figure out a way to get you a jump in position as well, so we
both feel like it's profitable to keep working together. Whether that
comes from you attacking England, or you keeping England onside while
the two of you take a bite out of Germany is negotiable to me.
This is waaay too long given that I'm so busy, so I'll stop here.
Let's keep the dialog going.
--- Eric
Message from France to England
Ben:
That was an ... interesting turn, let's say. I feel like a total idiot for
passing along Russia's message of support; he clearly know what he was
doing when he so-subtly indicated his assistance to you.
At least I ended up taking Munich. I can't *hold* it, but Russia may not
be as firmly in Germany's camp as it would seem. We should still try to
talk to him.
Of course, the now-apparent RT alliance is a cause for concern regardless
of what's gone down between us. It's nice to see that Italy will be busy
in the east for a while, but we could be facing a mighty powerful Bear if
Germany and Italy and Austria fold.
What do you think we should do? I need to look at the map; I'll also write
Russia and try to sort out what his thinking was.
Erik
Message from England to France
Erik -
> That was an ... interesting turn, let's say. I feel like a total idiot for
> passing along Russia's message of support; he clearly know what he was
> doing when he so-subtly indicated his assistance to you.
We need to remember - he's a tricky one.
> At least I ended up taking Munich. I can't *hold* it, but Russia may not
> be as firmly in Germany's camp as it would seem. We should still try to
> talk to him.
Absolutely. Obviously our relationship has changed; let me know what he
tells *you.*
> Of course, the now-apparent RT alliance is a cause for concern regardless
> of what's gone down between us. It's nice to see that Italy will be busy
> in the east for a while, but we could be facing a mighty powerful Bear if
> Germany and Italy and Austria fold.
>
> What do you think we should do? I need to look at the map; I'll also write
> Russia and try to sort out what his thinking was.
My top priority is retrieving a dot - whether it's from Norway, or
wherever. Why don't you see if Russia will consider NWY - STP & leaving
NWY English.
I have to go - family calling.
Ben
Message from England to France
Erik -
clarification:
> > At least I ended up taking Munich. I can't *hold* it, but Russia may not
> > be as firmly in Germany's camp as it would seem. We should still try to
> > talk to him.
> Absolutely. Obviously our relationship has changed; let me know what he
> tells *you.*
"our relationsip" meaning Russia's and mine. Not yours and mine.
Ben
Message from France to Germany
Tony:
I didn't really expect to take Munich, to be honest. The best I was
hoping
for was to tie you up defensively and chip away elsewhere. The Russian
certainly threw a wrench in those plans.
All in all, one of the more interesting sets of results I've seen so far.
As you said, Spring is always the season of paranoia and conspiracy. I
certainly didn't expect to see RT come up, not after the first year, but
there they are.
Given Russia's moves, it's pretty clear to me that England and I would
have a long and protracted fight against you, the same way that you and
England would have a tough time taking me on right now. What's the weak
link here? England. With Norway down and his forces bottled up, I am
certainly amenable to changing my plan and, as you suggested, heading for
Bel and Eng -- I do always have Por as a fallback. Frankly, with RT
rising
and Austria headed for an early exit, I'm not sure I can afford to see
you
get taken out -- RT will be too strong by the time England and I finished
with you.
Let me look at the board a little more -- I just wanted to write back
sooner rather than later and let you know that I'm quite open to working
with you as long as you're willing to extend me the same consideration.
Erik
Message from Germany to France
Good to hear Erik. I too was amazed about MUN. Not that its a problem. Just the fact that you tried it.
Anyway, EF didnt really coordinate their moves appraently. I was guarding against BEl/RUH/HOL scenario.
England is inded in trouble and is the weakest link. No harm doen as I can retake MUN. I am willing to give up BEL but you have to hit it with two units
Although I would suggest the move to IRI. POR you have as a backup when needed. You can use MUN to cut RUH support for BEL and take BEL using PIC & BUR. Suc6 guranteed and we are back on track.
Next year you are looking at LVP and POR. RT are looking strong and I know for a fact that AI are having their personal difficulties.
Look forward to hearing from you
Message from England to France
Erik -
When you get a chance let's figure out a plan. I would not be surprised to
see Tony tap MUN but not try to capture it. Let me get the discussion
started with, BUR - RUH, PIC - BEL, and MUN s BUR - RUH, with MAO - POR.
This way if KIE goes to HOL or supports DEN you hold MUN and take POR,
building twice. If MUN is dislodged, then you capture RUH. If HOL is
captured from BEL, you take BEL.
Right now I am in negotiations with Russia. I'm not really sure about how
to play the North but I do not want to have to remove a unit. Any
suggestions would be welcome.
Ben
Message from Russia to France
Erik,
Busy yesterday, sick today, but I do want to write something.
Any further thoughts on how to manage EG? Clearly I can see him stay even,
grow, or go down one. Are any of these preferable to the others?
If Tony holds Den, then at the end of the season he'll be even or plus one,
as I see it. He'll probably attack Mun with enough to dislodge you, hoping
Ben attacks me out of spite instead of Den. If that happens, then worst
case is that he trades Bel for Hol, holds Mun and ends up even. Basically
I'm asking: who do we want to see hurt the most?
Another question becomes: how clear do we want FR cooperation to be? If you
help Ben this year (e.g., support him to Bel) and I don't help him against
Tony, then we'll have a clear EF vs. GR. Then I could hit Tony (in Den/Ber)
while you take centers off of Ben (Bel, and a move on the Island) in '03.
That would force EG vs. FR, but they'd be so out of position that they
might not be able to do much about it.
I want to reiterate that I've been sick, so haven't really looked over the
board that carefully to consider the repercussions of that last suggestion.
But while I'm still out of it enough not to be worried about them, I'd be
interested to hear your thoughts. It would give us both a lot of momentum
that could let us swing to the south pretty quickly.
--- Eric
Message from England to France
Erik -
Since last we wrote, Eric's been urinating on my leg. He tells me it's
rain, but I don't believe him anymore. ;-)
Ben
Message from France to Russia
Eric:
I think we need to keep FR cooperation quiet for as long as possible. If
England believes that I'm working with you, especially now, his trust in
me is going to plummet. He's not too happy with you.
Tony's trying to get me to switch sides, of course, and is dangling
Belgium as a carrot. Since I can't hold Munich anyway, I may as well take
it. With Mun - Ruh, Pic - Bel and Bur S Pic - Bel, it's mine. I can tell
England that he should try to re-take Norway, which, thanks to support
from Sweden, should fail. That will put Germany at 4 or 5 (if he takes
Holland) and England at 3. Then we're set up for the plan as you outlines
it (you going for Den, me for the island).
I could even move Mao - Iri, playing into Tony's suggestions for me
switching sides, which would make me poised for a serious strike against
Ben next turn.
Thoughts?
Erik
Message from France to Italy
Andy:
I think be now it should be *very* obvious that the move to Piedmont was
a fluke, yes? And you should be quite please to see Ben and I tackling
Tony together.
So given how cooperative I've been lately, could you maybe shed some
light on what's going on in the Southeast for me?
Erik
Message from France to England
Ben --
I think I can take Belgium more or less uncontested this turn, despite
the probably loss of Munich. Mun - Ruhr, Pic - Bel, Bur S Pic - Bel.
Right? Under your suggestion, he could still end up breaking even this
turn, and he'd have to not attack Munich at all for Bur - Ruhr to work --
any attack will break that support, even if Mun isn't dislodged. Really,
to guarantee Ruhr, I'd have to attack from Munich. Seems like going for
Belgium is a better option.
I think Russia's move to Norway was born out of paranoia for his southern
situation. Given how that's going reasonably well, maybe he's less
anxious to have that build this season. Is there anything you can offer
him to back down?
Erik
Message from France to Austria
Phillipe:
Things aren't looking so hot for you right now, I have to say. That
Russian support of Turkey sort of baked your plans, didn't it? I wish I
could have given you some kind of warning, but all I had were hints from
third parties that you and Turkey weren't getting along.
Alas, Tyr is no longer there, so I can't even help you out there. Perhaps
we really should have grabbed at Italy when we had the chance.
So what's your plan now? England and I are still chiseling away at Tony;
I certainly didn't expect Tyr-Mun to work, but hey, I'll take it.
Erik
Message from France to Germany
Tony:
Yeah, if I'm going to head for Eng or Iri (which may be better), I'm
going to have to hit Bel. I need a fleet build to go after England, and
since MAO can't take Por if it's headed for Iri, that's got to come from
somewhere.
At least Russia seems semi-cooperative to your plans. He's not interested
in seeing Northern English fleets, I can tell you that much. For now,
while Austria's still alive, that's some consolation to you.
Do you know where Andy stands vis-a-vis Russia and Turkey? He's got
reason to work with RT right now, but he's got to know that they'll crush
him -- unless Russia's got something longer-term cooking with Italy.
So what's your plan?
Erik
Message from Russia to France
Erik,
I've been off of email all weekend and apparently so have you.
After some press I've recieved over the weekend, I'm reasonably certain that
it's a good idea for us to do something to hamstring Ben. If I attack Germany
now, it's going to allow Ben to pick and choose between us (Tony and me).
That's bad for me. I'm also reasonably certain that Andy and Ben have a deal
to come after you after they each cement their positions against A and G
respectively (one big indicator is that Andy seems unusually upset that I may
be slowing down Ben's progress). That's bad for you.
So as noted in the last message I'd like to talk about what we can do to
quickly clean up in the north.
--- Eric
Message from Italy to France
Erik,
> I think be now it should be *very* obvious that the move to Piedmont was
> a fluke, yes? And you should be quite please to see Ben and I tackling
> Tony together.
I am
>
> So given how cooperative I've been lately, could you maybe shed some
> light on what's going on in the Southeast for me?
>
Well...Im not 100% sure. And I am involved in it.
Ask me the same question after this fall move.
Andy
Message from Russia to France
Erik,
Our messages crossed.
I'm sure that Tony is offering to cut support for Nwy for Ben to keep Ben
focused away from Den. Who knows, he may even go through with it. Tony is
doing whatever he can to break up EF. If you got Bel and Iri, that would
basically cut Ben out of everything (guaranteed down two by 04) and then we
could collapse on Tony.
To be honest, that's waaay more aggressive than I normally play this game,
but I'd be willing to give it a go if you are.
I have to go to bed now, so will likely not see your response to this until
tomorrow.
--- Eric
Message from Germany to France
Good to hear from you Erik. I can ubderstand you hitting belgium. I will be
hitting Holland and removing you from Munich.
Thats all I have planned this round. As for Austria I have no idea. He is
not very communicative, Italy even less so.
I do worry about RT, thats was some nice diploming by Russia. I got him to
build in STP and go after ENgland. I had to break EF up any way I could and
get some alliance going with either of you.
Englands seems the easiest to attack now. I still have this gut feeling that
Russia will build in STP again this year so the sooner we get to England the
better. At least denying ENgland a build means that you are in LVP next
spring and nothing he can do about it. That means two builds for you next
year (LVP & POR). WIth the build from BEL this you put you firmly in the
driving seat. I will soon have to get some sort of alliance with Austria on
the rails but for now he isnt communicating.
Have you any news on IA.?
Message from England to France
Erik -
> I think I can take Belgium more or less uncontested this turn, despite
> the probably loss of Munich. Mun - Ruhr, Pic - Bel, Bur S Pic - Bel.
> Right? Under your suggestion, he could still end up breaking even this
> turn, and he'd have to not attack Munich at all for Bur -
> Ruhr to work --
> any attack will break that support, even if Mun isn't
> dislodged. Really,
> to guarantee Ruhr, I'd have to attack from Munich. Seems like
> going for Belgium is a better option.
I agree 100%. Go for BEL. There is a very good chance he will not try to
dislodge MUN anyway, so you may end up with both. *And* POR. Good luck, my
friend.
> I think Russia's move to Norway was born out of paranoia for
> his southern
> situation. Given how that's going reasonably well, maybe he's less
> anxious to have that build this season. Is there anything you
> can offer him to back down?
I've tried talking to him about it but he is pretty firmly resisting my
overtures. He suggested he *might* support me into DEN but after he (a)
built in STP and (b) captured NWY, I'm leery of coordinating with him.
Basically we are looking at an RT. In an RT Russia *must* capture the far
North. So Eric is playing out his part of the string, and I do not know if
I would do it any differently, in his shoes. The alliance structure in the
East may change, but for now, I am dealing with a force not of my making.
He wants to keep NWY. If he keeps NWY as a "loaner" it will be nearly
impossible for me to reclaim except by force, as it will require me to land
a unit next to STP, which is something he will not likely agree to.
Bear in mind how last phase he used you against us. . .
Ben
Message from England to France
Erik -
Perhaps if you do get two or three builds you will consider beginning your
push into the Med. The reason I say this is, whether there is an RT or an
RI makes little difference to me in the North. But if it is an RI, which is
perfectly likely, then you may be looking at Andy pushing at you as Eric is
pushing at me, in the imminent future.
Turkey seems to think it is an RT. But of course it's what *he* would
think; after all, it's what he's being told. . .
Ben
Message from France to Germany
Nothing from IA, really. Andy continues to encourage Ben and I to take you
down, but that's nothing new.
Would you be willing to consider breaking Russia's support of Nwy? As much
as we need to take England out, we also *really* need to keep Russia in
check. If I'm headed for Iri or Eng anyway, allowing Ben to keep that
extra unit isn't going to make much of a difference -- he'll still be out
of position.
Erik
Message from France to England
> I agree 100%. Go for BEL. There is a very good chance he will not try
> to
> dislodge MUN anyway, so you may end up with both. *And* POR. Good
> luck, my
> friend.
Will do. Is there any way you can get Germany to break Sweden's support?
Germany can't be too pleased about seeing RT at his back, and maybe you
can dangle a truce in Germany's face as a way to get the support you need.
You've clearly both got a problem with Russia.
Since Holland seems like an impossibility, it seems to me that you would
be better off at least trying to enlist some help from Germany to get your
Scandanavian center back. You can't do damage against Germany this turn,
I'll be doing plenty, so you should try to save yourself up north and keep
Russia from getting too dominant.
>
> He wants to keep NWY. If he keeps NWY as a "loaner" it will be nearly
> impossible for me to reclaim except by force, as it will require me to
> land
> a unit next to STP, which is something he will not likely agree to.
No such thing as a loaner in this game, if you ask me. Let's see if we can
get Germany to cut support for Nwy.
Just got your other message. I would indeed be willing to consider
building down south. Andy isn't a problem right now, but that can only
last a year or two max. I'm a little soft down there right now, so F Mar
or, if you're willing to consider it, F Bre - Mao - Spa (sc) are both
options.
Erik
Message from France to Russia
Eric:
I agree, it's a little aggressive, but I see opportunities here. Thanks
for the info about Andy and Ben, though that's not surprising; I'd be
doing the same in both their positions. The key is to take one of them out
before that can happen. Italy seems more useful to you in the near-term,
so I think England is the obivious candidate.
I'm going to end up with Belgium no matter what. Ben is fixated on taking
Norway back; as such, you may want to watch for slipper maneuvers on
Tony's part -- it would not be entirely out of line for him to suddenly
break your support to Nwy and let England back in. In fact, that's the
sort of manipulation that he seems to be most fond of.
The big question is simply whether I should make a move on Iri right now
or not. If you keep Nwy, are you planning on building StP? If so, what and
which coast?
And heading into next turn, how do we continue with this? Can you afford
to send, for example, Gal over to Sil?
Erik
Message from England to France
Erik -
> Will do. Is there any way you can get Germany to break
> Sweden's support?
Tony's offered me support into SWE. For now, the situation in the East is
*very* favorable to Russia - basically getting some Austrian spoils while I
and T fight each other over the Balkans - and that's not good for Germany
either. So I am keeping my fingers crossed that Tony will keep his word,
this time.
> Germany can't be too pleased about seeing RT at his back, and
> maybe you
> can dangle a truce in Germany's face as a way to get the
> support you need.
> You've clearly both got a problem with Russia.
*sigh*
> Since Holland seems like an impossibility, it seems to me
> that you would
> be better off at least trying to enlist some help from
> Germany to get your
> Scandanavian center back. You can't do damage against Germany
> this turn,
> I'll be doing plenty, so you should try to save yourself up
> north and keep Russia from getting too dominant.
We are of like mind - that's the plan. Maintain position against Germany
but push Russia off the ball in the North.
> > He wants to keep NWY. If he keeps NWY as a "loaner" it
> > will be nearly impossible for me to reclaim except by
> > force, as it will require me to land a unit next to STP,
> > which is something he will not likely agree to.
>
> No such thing as a loaner in this game, if you ask me.
Well, sometimes there is real dot-swapping, and I have no problem with that.
But I do not believe it is appropriate for Russia to be claiming Norway in
'02, barring something extreme we are not seeing here.
> Just got your other message. I would indeed be willing to consider
> building down south. Andy isn't a problem right now, but that can only
> last a year or two max. I'm a little soft down there right
> now, so F Mar
> or, if you're willing to consider it, F Bre - Mao - Spa (sc) are both
> options.
When we get to that bridge, we will cross it.
Ben
Message from Germany to France
I am currently looking at the situation in the north with both England and
Russia. I am awaiting a reply from both of them.
It will be interesting to see how the situation in the east develops.
Message from Russia to France
Erik,
From recent press I think there's a good chance E/G may be working against
me. I may well lose Nwy. Consider in your planning on Iri vs. Por that
England may not actually go down a center. That may affect how much you want
to press Ben vs. Tony.
--- Eric
Austria: Army Budapest SUPPORT Army Serbia
Austria: Army Serbia SUPPORT Russian Fleet Sevastopol → Rumania (*cut*)
Austria: Fleet Trieste → Adriatic Sea
Austria: Army Vienna → Trieste (*bounce*)
England: Fleet London → North Sea (*bounce*)
England: Fleet North Sea → Norway (*bounce*)
England: Fleet Skagerrak → Sweden (*bounce*)
England: Army Yorkshire HOLD
France: Army Burgundy SUPPORT Army Picardy → Belgium
France: Fleet Mid-Atlantic Ocean → Portugal
France: Army Munich → Ruhr
France: Army Picardy → Belgium
Germany: Army Belgium → Burgundy (*bounce, destroyed*)
Germany: Army Berlin → Munich
Germany: Fleet Denmark HOLD
Germany: Army Kiel SUPPORT Army Berlin → Munich
Germany: Army Ruhr → Holland
Italy: Army Greece → Serbia (*bounce*)
Italy: Fleet Ionian Sea → Tunis
Italy: Fleet Naples → Ionian Sea
Italy: Army Venice → Trieste (*bounce*)
Russia: Army Galicia SUPPORT Fleet Sevastopol → Rumania
Russia: Army Norway SUPPORT Fleet Sweden (*cut*)
Russia: Fleet Sevastopol → Rumania
Russia: Fleet Sweden SUPPORT Army Norway (*cut*)
Russia: Army Ukraine SUPPORT Fleet Sevastopol → Rumania
Turkey: Fleet Black Sea SUPPORT Army Rumania
Turkey: Army Bulgaria SUPPORT Italian Army Greece → Serbia
Turkey: Army Constantinople SUPPORT Army Bulgaria
Turkey: Army Rumania SUPPORT Italian Army Greece → Serbia (*cut, destroyed*)
|