|
|
Message from France to Italy
Ken:
Will the game be stopping now? I do not want to get too involved if
this deadline will be advanced. If we are going to have a long
extension, we might as well start it at the beginning of a game year.
Good luck,
Roger
aka you French Fairy Godfather :-)
Message from Italy to France
>
> Will the game be stopping now?
>
In a word, yes. I can't eat solid foods past 4:00 am and I just can't
diplome on an empty stomach. :)
Message [from Russia] to all
Oh Joy, Oh Rapture! It's EoY Time, Again!
Message from France to Italy
Ken:
If you read this before you have your surgery, set draw
and send me a short note that you did. We will see what
happens.
Roger
Message from Master to all
I'm moving deadline way out, since Italy is going under the knife
to get that pitching arm fixed once and for all. When he's ready to
type at full speed, he'll give me an email and I'll move the deadline
back in.
Until then, everyone just sit tight. Thanks!
Get well soon, Ken,
Doug
masseyd@btv.ibm.com as Master set the deadline
for game 'titleist' to Sat Mar 09 2002 23:30:00 -0500.
Grace period deadline advanced to Tue Mar 12 2002 23:30:00 -0500.
Message from Russia to all
>Broadcast message from masseyd@btv.ibm.com
>I'm moving deadline way out, since Italy is going under the knife
>Get well soon, Ken,
Good luck. I hope the surgery is successful, and
without complications.
Eric.
Message from Italy to France
Draw set.
Message from France to England, Italy, and Russia
It is clear that no one is really enjoying this game
anymore. Therefore I am setting draw.
Regards,
Roger
Message from England to France, Italy, and Russia
I have set draw.
Allen/Ivy
Message from Russia to England, France, and Italy
> Message from France to England, Italy and Russia in 'titleist':
> It is clear that no one is really enjoying this game
> anymore. Therefore I am setting draw.
> Message from England to Russia, Italy and France in 'titleist':
> I have set draw.
I will set draw if I get confirmation that Italy has also done so.
Nick/Eric.
Message from England to France, Italy, and Russia
Friends,
I've decided that I would feel better if I didn't negotiate in
"titleist" until Ken returns and tell us that he active again.
Feel free to use my personal e-mail if you have unrelated matters
to discuss -- for example, the Steelers, or why the sea is boiling hot and
whether pigs have wings.
Ivy/Allen
Message from France to England, Italy, and Russia
OK, I can live with Ivy's suggestion/decision. Anything
discussed now is only idle chatter anyway. It would all
have to be redone.
Until we meet again.
--King Roger XIII
Message from Russia to England, France, and Italy
I'm Setting Draw with this message.
Message [from Russia] to all
> Game 'titleist' has been declared a draw between
> England, France, Italy and Russia.
> Congratulations on a game well-played.
I will not comment on the irony of this last sentence.
Message from France to all
End of Game Summary
>Game 'titleist' has been declared a draw between
>England, France, Italy and
>Russia. Congratulations on a game well-played.
Congratulations to everyone.
I realize that observers may question me for setting
draw. I did it because no one was enjoying the game
anymore.
Yes, I could have won by trying to take advantage of the
personality conflicts. It was definitely a reasonable
possibility. I really didn't care enough about winning
to continue down that path. I won the second round game
partially that way (personality conflicts). It is not
really very enjoyable. There was also the chance that I
could have gotten beaten back down and someone else could
have won. The odds were not as high on that, but
Russian-Italian cooperation could have taken all of my
Balkan centers and I was one unit short on a stalemated
defense in France. But that was not the main reason for
my setting draw.
I guess that I won the tournament by being the largest
power in the draw, but that was not a motivation.
Besides everyone could have made a case to deserve to be
in the draw. Eric for his recovery from near death. Ken
for hanging on so long without any home centers. Allen
for managing, desperately and repeatedly, to piece
together enough of a pseudo-peace to deny me the victory.
I congratulate you all. I also liked and get along with
everyone. I am glad that I had a chance to get to know,
even it with Ken it was at the very end.
This is an unusual EOG statement for me. I usually write
very long ones. But I have written plenty of end of year
statements, so I will not go into all the details. I may
respond to other statements.
I wish everyone well and again thank Doug for running
both the game and the tournament.
Regards,
Roger Yonkoski
Aka Prince Xavier Boar and at times Le Dauphin
Message from Master to all
And so it ends!
Congratulations to Roger, Allen, Eric, and Ken.
And in particular, congratulations to Roger Yonkoski, who by rule takes
the crown as 2000-2002 Vermont Group Full Press Tournament Champion.
A special thank you to all seven players for their play and their
demeanor. The quality of this game was almost as high as I expected --
things seemed to deteriorate at the end a bit, but that shouldn't take
away from the overall quality that was displayed in the game.
A few game notes from your GM:
I was sure that Roger was toast early in the game. In reading his
partial press (which I'll make available as quickly as time permits),
I was amazed to see him wriggle off the hook. Ken grew quickly
while Roger held off Allen in the west.
I was sure by 1905 that, with Randy's elimination and Jeff's position
in the east, that Ken was going to be able to cruise to largest power.
I thought that the north would resolve itself into two larger powers
and Ken would be able to secure the largest spot and the title of
champion.
I was sure that in the endgame, Allen, Ken, and Eric would settle
their differences and beat Roger back, creating a longer battle for
supremacy amongst the four.
I was wrong, wrong, wrong. I've learned a *lot* by reading along and
I hope that others will do so as well. You've done two things well
in this game, if nothing else:
(1) Shown how to stop a leader (Italy)
(2) Shown how not to stop a leader (France)
I won't join into the debate of who did what and how things might
have been different and what was handed to whom -- others will do
so, I'm sure. I hope that this game will be the basis for much
discussion amongst the Diplomacy community as a whole, which was always
part of the point of the Tournament.
I suppose I should start thinking about the second tournament now.
I hope that the seven of you will be ready to cross swords again!
Doug
Message from France to all
>And in particular, congratulations to Roger Yonkoski,
>who by rule takes the crown as 2000-2002 Vermont Group
>Full Press Tournament Champion.
Thanks. When will my Trouphy arrive? I hope it is a big
one! How much space should I make available?
>(2) Shown how not to stop a leader (France)
I disagree a bit here. They managed to prevent my
soloing many times, despite their differences. It was
more of a an example of doing enough to prevent a
victory, while at the same time trying to improve one's
own relative position within the group. This type of
alliance is played out in real life all the time.
Roger
Message from Russia to all
Russian EoG in 'titleist':
What a frustrating game this has been. I was stabbed
by Austria and Turkey in F1901M and kept from building,
reduced to three Centers in 1902, attacked by Germany
in 1903, reduced to two Home Centers in 1905, and by
the end of 1906, I only had one Home Center left,
though I had managed to hang on to three Centers. I
finally got back to four Centers in 1907, but was
stabbed by Turkey so that I was left with one Home
Center and nowhere to build. The turnaround continued
in 1908 as I reached, two Home Centers, four Units,
and six Centers, but I lost those two unused builds in
1909. In 1910, I returned to my 1908 levels, but it
was not until 1911 that I managed to field more Units
than I started the game with, and regain a third Home
Center. By the end of 1912, I actually had eight
Units and Centers, and I began to consider the
possibility that I might actually be able to win the
tournament, and possibly even solo. Then, of course,
things went to hell, again. 8-) I was ill between
1912 Builds and the S1913M deadline, and was unable
to focus on planning moves or sending my normal volume
of Press, and England took my silence to mean I was
planning to stab, and sent me several letters saying
he was going to make "harmless" defensive moves, as a
result. I pulled back from Kiel-Den because he had
said he wanted to remain close in Center count, and
my pulling back opened Kiel and Holland to him, and I
moved my St. Petersburg Army to Norway to bounce the
move I thought he would make, and keep him from being
adjacent to StP. England was convinced this was a
stab, and nothing I said could convince him otherwise,
so I looked at the move as a possible stab to see if
there was more potential in those moves than I had
seen. I concluded that stabbing England at that
point was a losing proposition, and pulled back in
the Fall. By this point, my relationship with Italy
and England was so strained that one or both of them
seemed bound to take offense at something I had done
or said every turn, so when France proposed a
four-way, I reluctantly agreed even though with
minimal cooperation we could have eliminated Italy.
My thanks to Doug, for running this tournament, and
my congratulations to Roger, Allen, and Ken, for
surviving this hard-fought struggle, and especially
to Roger for winning the Tournament.
Eric Hunter/Czar Nicholas II of Russia in 'titleist'/
(Chancellor Hans-Peter Gurkun of Germany in 'splinter')
|